Last post by Libby A. in topic More Photos

Topics: 2760
Posts: 29225

GRACE AND EXQUISITE MODELS INT'L

 
 
Total results: 18
Pages: 1    [1]
 
This is to inform everyone that I am not working with the above named agency i.e exquisite models int'l. I have instructed them to stop using my photos. But my photos were named Vivian Nappier on thier site. Please everyone should not this. I'll be signing up with another agency in Nigeria very soon.
sherlly butshy

Huh? and Double huh?

You can do that?

Explain please.
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

Wow! I see what you mean. They are using your photos...

:angry:

Yes, Cheri, but Grace has not said whether they listed her with or without her permission.

One interesting thing is that the photos on their site are much more professionally done than the photos on her profile here.

Grace made a statement out in the open without any back story. Are we to assume by the tone of her post that the agency did something wrong? I do not know. I cannot judge. Others should not try to make a judgment without at least a better explanation.

Grace has made a very inflammatory statement and provided nothing to back it up.
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

Hmm.. I do see what you mean. She must elaborate on this..


:dunno:

You can ask me any questions and I will answer. They listed me with my permission. All the photos on this site and the ones I sent to them are downloaded from the same CDs. They are a combination of photo sessions at Cybermul studio and snap it studio. What else do you want to know?
sherlly butshy

So, if you sent the pictures to them you don't think they should use them? I am not sure I understand what the complaint actually is...

Cheri: I believe from the get go that I knew what her problem was. That is why I posted my initial response to her statement. Be in this business as long as I have and you get to recognize the same red flags waving again and again. Can you figure out what happened, Cheri? The clues are there.




Grace O.:

This is to inform everyone that I am not working with the above named agency i.e exquisite models int'l. I have instructed them to stop using my photos. But my photos were named Vivian Nappier on thier site. Please everyone should not this. I'll be signing up with another agency in Nigeria very soon.



Grace O.:

You can ask me any questions and I will answer. They listed me with my permission. All the photos on this site and the ones I sent to them are downloaded from the same CDs. They are a combination of photo sessions at Cybermul studio and snap it studio. What else do you want to know?



The thing is, Grace, that the tone of your initial writing implies that they did something wrong. You made it seem like they stole your images and posted under a fictitious name.

Now the original impression you gave is turning out false. Your pictures and promotional were done with permission. Should I also assume that you authorized the use of a trade name? And what is with the difference in the stats on that site and this site? Your height, build and location are different. Even your age is different. So, which is the real you?

And I read their standard representation contract. Did you sign one of those as well as permission to be listed and promoted by them? If so, have you read the terms of that contract? It seems to me that your declaration of not being represented by them would fly directly in the face of their terms for cancellation of contract. Even if you gave notice of dissolution, you still seem bound to them for a period of time.

For your sake, I certainly hope there was some malfeasance on their part in representing you. For a fact, not being able to get gigs for a model does not count as malfeasance or even proper grounds for instant, no obligation, separation from an agency.

Fooling around with someone's business reputation without cause is not something a smart person wants to do. It also makes most of us think twice about hiring you.
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

I am not complaining about anything, I'm only notifying everyone that I'm not working with them anymore. All the information on my profile on this site is very true and correct. When I registered with them, my photos and statistics were posted on their site. I asked them to correct the mistakes they made on the information about me. They corrected some.
They didn't steal my images. I sent them to them.
I notified Ibikunle(the Nigerian agent) about my intention for dissolution and it was agreed that my photos won't be used by them anymore. I was suprised to still see my photos on thier site with another person's name, statistics and location!
Moreover, I joined them in the year 2006! AND I think I gave enough time for seperation.It's not an instant separation.

I am not fooling around with someone's reputation.
sherlly butshy

so they use your pictures with another name without your permission? is it legal? your situation is very confusing :cantlook:

Before I decided to stop working with them, my pictures were posted with my name on thier site with my permission. After agreeing that my photos won't be used by them, my photos were given another person's name and data.
sherlly butshy

it doesn't sound right to me. it sounds like scam. but if it's ok with you, then it's alright :dunno:

Grace:

I believe that there are still reciprocal legal agreements and treaties in place between the United Kingdom and Nigeria from the colony days. If you have a legitimate greivance against them, or believe you do, you should file a proper complaint with authorities rather than ambiguous, unclear postings.

The contract terms stipulated by Exquisite are some of the toughest I have ever seen in the industry...especially for non-exclusive representation. 40% to 50% of earnings is rough but apparently legal. Six months to a year continual residuals after cancellation is also a tough one...but you seem to have signed for that. Be careful when signing. Do not just read a contract...understand it!

Agencies will sometimes assign a stage name, trade name or fictitious name to models...perfectly legal. Some agencies will even fudge stats for marketing purposes. Fudging stats is not a good practice for an agency that wants to maintain a solid reputation but not necessarily illegal. None of this, however, should be done without consulting with you.

Since I bought a model agency I had initially made the decision not to place it on the internet because of some of the bad reputation associated with an internet presence. That seems to be changing as more and more legitimate agencies are using the internet as an incredible marketing tool. My own company is now in the process of launching an internet presence but one critical thing continues to concern me: How in the world can an agency represent someone they have never met or trained? How does one know that an agency recruiting through the internet has properly vetted all of the models listed? I believe this quagmire can be solved through a simple preponderance of evidence. Constant communication, continually updated information and images, test shoots, video, researchable credentials.

There is no way that a model can upload a bunch of pictures to me to be used as their portfolio and I turn around and try to sell that model. No way. I have someone on the ground interview, photograph and video tape. That is the only way I can be certain I am dealing with a real live person and not some sort of fraud.

I am a rookie in the world of internet representation but I firmly believe that the hard and fast rules that have governed agencies for centuries must still apply in an internet world.
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

I didn't put up this post to confuse anyone. I just wanted to let everyone know that I don't work with them anymore.
Since I was misrepersented in thier site, I was feeling unsafe with what else they could do with my images or information.
I didn't sign thier representation contract and I don't work with them anymore.
sherlly butshy

Grace O.:

I didn't put up this post to confuse anyone. I just wanted to let everyone know that I don't work with them anymore.
Since I was misrepersented in thier site, I was feeling unsafe with what else they could do with my images or information.
I didn't sign thier representation contract and I don't work with them anymore.


An interesting approach you have decided to take. Be careful.

I am not picking sides as to who is right or wrong in this issue between you and the agency. I urge evryone once again to read and understand. If English is not your first language and, if it is and you have never learned how words are used to convey levels of intent, please find someone educate in English or Law to interpret the document for you.

Grace, you admitted in previous posts that you provided and electronic signature for them. Just as good as pen and paper. If you read their terms and conditions I will bet you did not understand them. I write and interpret law as one of my many hats. U.S. law is based upon British Common Law so I have more than a passing familiarity with the interpretations, applications, case histories and precedents. Interestingly enough, if you know your history, most countries' laws on this planet are based upon British Common Law.

Be careful models! Know what you are doing or ask for help first!

Why does this entire situation on both sides remind me of the phrase in an American cereal commercial: "Silly rabbit. Tricks are for kids."?
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

Carib Goodies:

[Grace O.: ...]

An interesting approach you have decided to take. Be careful.

I am not picking sides as to who is right or wrong in this issue between you and the agency. I urge evryone once again to read and understand. If English is not your first language and, if it is and you have never learned how words are used to convey levels of intent, please find someone educate in English or Law to interpret the document for you.

Grace, you admitted in previous posts that you provided and electronic signature for them. Just as good as pen and paper. If you read their terms and conditions I will bet you did not understand them. I write and interpret law as one of my many hats. U.S. law is based upon British Common Law so I have more than a passing familiarity with the interpretations, applications, case histories and precedents. Interestingly enough, if you know your history, most countries' laws on this planet are based upon British Common Law.

Be careful models! Know what you are doing or ask for help first!

Why does this entire situation on both sides remind me of the phrase in an American cereal commercial: "Silly rabbit. Tricks are for kids."?


I only filled & submitted the online form. Is that a signature. Please explain. I need to understand. I have asked for advice and help before taking this action. The online form required that an applicant should have the requirements stated in the contract form. Does filling the form means signing the contract? Please explain more. Since you've been in the industry long before I, you should be in a better position to advice.
sherlly butshy

this is funny so they gave you my name,i didn't know i had a twin bearing the exact same name as me,this is ridiculous

Girl, your new shots are beautiful. But, I think it's too sexy. Nice shots!
sherlly butshy

From now on 50 activity points will turn into 1 credit, so you may earn credits as easy as never before !!!



All models and photographers are able to moderate photos! We will save a lot of time for moderators this way. Please read the short instruction on how to moderate and earn points very quickly.
Also, models and photographers can moderate part of the profiles as well! This is a fast way to earn some action points and credits!
 
 
Total results: 18
Pages: 1    [1]
 


Login
You must login using Your jurgita.com account to get full forum access.
If You do not have a jurgita.com account, please feel free to register.