Last post by Gary Young in topic hi, does anyone know if Glamour hit list is a scam??

Topics: 3397
Posts: 39351

Camera/Video Equipment

 
 
Total results: 16
Pages: 1    [1]
 
Can I as a start up photographer, get by with a video camera, 35mm camera and a digital camera? Video for interviews and how model reacts when live, 35mm for versatile still shots and digital to just shoot away and save the best.

If you use the digital right, you can do away with the 35mm. Always save tour frames in RAW. Make sure you have a good photography program such as photoshop elements or photofiltre on your computer. Also make sure you have good lighting. If you have all of these, you should be okay.

Thank Mark, Think I am getting hang of things. Still looking for that one special model(s) to start with.

You'll find plenty of models here. Have fun.

Well, unless you want to file for bankruptcy every six months like every pro photographer had to do back in the day, stay away from film. My God, were those expensive days! Well, not so much after you got the hang of each type of film and the peculiarities of each different camera, but the learning curve is a freaking whack on the wallet!

Film is so much different than digital. You do not expose digital the same as you expose film. And while the learning curve on digital is about the same as film, it does not take as long, digital, unlike film, does not spoil or age between shoots. Digital color does not change because of the temperature. No slip ups in processing causing you to lose your shoot. No waiting period to review your images. No very expensive call backs of models and grips for do-overs. No print variation. No all-nighters in the darkroom breathing crap like fumes from Microdol X or Potassium Ferro Cyanide. No prints sticking together in the heat or because all of the fixer didn't squeegee off. No running out of film during a shoot. No worry about condensation in-canister when running in and out of cold or heat. Not forgetting the ASA/ISO on the wrong film speed. No hundreds of dollars out of pocket before a shoot even begins.

Nah...drop the film camera. Not needed at all for what you plan to do. And despite the arguments of some pros, I have yet to see digital fail to do anything film can. Yup, you film buffs...that is my proclamation. Get your hands on a true digital camera...not the watered down "35mm's" they sell in the stores, but a true digital camera...and then lie to me and tell me that film can beat it for resolution and color depth. If you want to view true digital quality, check out the stuff NASA was producing as far back as 1966. Yeah...just like chip speed for PCs, the technology has been there but is being let out to retail very slowly. Even so, off the shelf can go toe to toe with film.

Sometime aback one of the photo mags did a blind test with pro photographers who swore by film. I cannot remember the magazine but the results surprised and embarrassed the pros who could not guess correctly which images were film and which were digital with the naked eye.
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

Yep, here's a simple little test: Remember that wonderful grainy look of film?
If I haven't been there, I'm still planning on going!
If I haven't done it, I've still got time to try!

But then it was supplanted by the versatility of digital imagery:
If I haven't been there, I'm still planning on going!
If I haven't done it, I've still got time to try!

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.
If I haven't been there, I'm still planning on going!
If I haven't done it, I've still got time to try!

Carib & Charles, Thanks for information. I love digital. Crisp & clear. Goofs instantly trashed. Used to waste a lot of film, exposure, ceiling shots, pictures of finger, etc. Look at digital as a computer that takes pics. Both of you always have great answers and are prominent in forum. Cheers Charles!

Depending on the camera of course

a decent digital camera with full manual is much better than a P&S

For the most part though the film camera is an antique, unless you are speaking about a med/large format camera

Maybe a bit late but I would like to reply on the film issue.

@ Carib, agree, film is costly and time consuming. To digitalise it needs expensive equipment, like a Hasselblad or Fuji.
I use the Fuji 680 GXIII after I digitalise the films using an Epson V750.

The problem with digital is colour, depth and focus. The flatness of the sensor takes it away and going to large formats, digital is losing quickly quality. As long as you stay in A4-A3 it is all right, beyon that, they are not as good as the Hasselblad, Rollei or Fuji.
Depending on the setting of my scanner, my filesizes vary from 450 Mb to 2,2 Gb per take.
You'll need very fast pc's to work with this kind of pictujres.

15 megapixels & 500dpi resolution works fine with the core 2 duo desk top and laptop, if your pc's running slow with large images increase the DDR memory up to at least 1gb & it should work much faster:thumbup:
:cool:

Hahah yes it is oke :)

with high ISO on digital, i think u can 'fake' the grainy look of film for some classic look - needs some photoshop editing though

From now on 50 activity points will turn into 1 credit, so you may earn credits as easy as never before !!!



All models and photographers are able to moderate photos! We will save a lot of time for moderators this way. Please read the short instruction on how to moderate and earn points very quickly.
Also, models and photographers can moderate part of the profiles as well! This is a fast way to earn some action points and credits!
 
 
Total results: 16
Pages: 1    [1]