Page 3 Topless 17 Year Old Total results: 53 Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 [ 3] |
|---|
 ID: 186379 Posts: 25 | Date: 2008-07-25 05:32 Today the Sun newspaper (UK) published a Topless model aged 17 years called
Rosie?
This should make a good topic for debate (again)
Is it right or wrong?
Indecent or not?
Whats your views?
Tony. |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-07-25 05:43 Well first up if the sun newspaper have broken the UK laws if she is really
under 18!
To pose topless for newspaper/magazine in the UK a girl must be 18 as with
anything glamour... the sun will probally get pulled by the regulators yet again
as it's not the first time they've had an under 18 published
News of the world have once printed a picture of a 16 year old to my
knowlage |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 150817 Posts: 166 | Date: 2008-07-25 05:53 Well, not always they print the correct model age Both ways. It is a
publicity, and that counts. Tho it seems that they dont care that is is not good
one Part of jurgita.com administration team. |
|---|
|
|---|
ID: 186379 Posts: 25 | Date: 2008-07-25 05:55 Gary Young:
Well first up if the sun newspaper have broken the UK laws if she is really
under 18!
To pose topless for newspaper/magazine in the UK a girl must be 18 as with
anything glamour... the sun will probally get pulled by the regulators yet again
as it's not the first time they've had an under 18 published
News of the world have once printed a picture of a 16 year old to my
knowlage
I have heard of the Sun/News of the world doing this in the past!
But if publication of under 18's is illegal, there wouldn't be any David
Hamilton books on sale in this country, for instance?????? |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-07-25 05:55 On the frontpage it says that Rosie is 18 years old! |
|---|
|
|---|
ID: 186379 Posts: 25 | Date: 2008-07-25 05:58 OK! BVBA:
On the frontpage it says that Rosie is 18 years old!
Online it says she is 18 years but 17 in the actually printed newspaper?? |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 36347 Posts: 296 | Date: 2008-07-25 06:59 Most contries that is perfectly fine. But if you want to say 18 is the age
restriction for that then you should probably say 20 is actually. That is about
the age when the human brain is fully developed and people can honestly make
sound decisions. Quote! That is why the drining age in the US is 21. 18 comes
from being able to send kids to war. Which makes so much freekin senceOwner
Bodi N Balance LLC
www.bodinbalance.com |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-07-25 08:49 Sounds like a print error. Everything I read says she is 18, |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 170469 Posts: 1 | Date: 2008-07-25 09:51 Gary Young:
Well first up if the sun newspaper have broken the UK laws if she is really
under 18!
To pose topless for newspaper/magazine in the UK a girl must be 18 as with
anything glamour... the sun will probally get pulled by the regulators yet again
as it's not the first time they've had an under 18 published
News of the world have once printed a picture of a 16 year old to my
knowlage
Gary, I don't disagree with you that it's probably wrong... but it's not against
the law. Show me the law that says what you say the law says!
It's so much muddier and grey than that. It's probably about time someone
challenged it all so we get a proper set of legislation. |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-07-25 10:19 The law for the press is exactly the same as for the likes of loaded, zoo, nuts,
and all the other lad's mags (as we call them in britain)... 18! |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-07-25 14:23 Hey,
My question id why did the girl allow the newspaper to publish her topless in
the first place, weather she is 17 or 18 is important as you have to be 18 to do
Glamour in the first place. But the fact that she allowed herself to be
photographed and printed in the paper says alot about her own moral values and
self-respect.
|
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 246345 Posts: 665 | Date: 2008-07-26 08:31 18th is k, but 17th, or16th, i'm not agree |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 128069 Posts: 626 | Date: 2008-07-26 14:42 Does anyone has the link to the cover pic which we can view?
Will take a look at the UK laws and see which are the ones which stipulate the
18 year old limit  |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 247625 Posts: 17 | Date: 2008-07-26 15:28 Anushka Bester:
Right, I agree with Gary.
Pesonally, I think the world in general should at least get back some morals,
which in reality boils down to self-respect!!
I think the whole situation is very sad, cause the girl allowed herself to be
photographed and the newspaper published it. What makes it even worse is the
people who actually buy such publicity. 
Lets all hope this kind of thing does not happen again and that modeling in
general will be done with respect and professionlism.
I'm sorry to tell you that rather than this not happening again it is actually
happening all the time. At least the U.K. and U.S. have an under 18's law (even
if it's not very clear what is and isn't covered by it) whereas many parts of
Europe and Asia don't have the law at all.
Back in the 80's the law was only covering minors under 16, which meant Sam Fox
and others could make their fortunes baring all. I don't remember being shocked
back then, and never heard of anyone who was. When the law changed to 18 many
publications stopped showing under 18's, but that didn't stop them applying by
the dozen. You can still see proof of it by visiting the sites the likes of FHM
and Loaded magazine, where under 18's have been spotted many a time.
When someone can explain to me how this law works I will be so much happier. A
girl can marry at 16, can have sex at 16, cant model topless until 18, unless
it's for personal use, or is not classed as explicit? I'm afraid the problem
here is with the law in the first place.  |
|---|
|
|---|
ID: 247625 Posts: 17 | Date: 2008-07-26 15:32 Orsiris Pte Ltd:
Does anyone has the link to the cover pic which we can view?
Will take a look at the UK laws and see which are the ones which stipulate the
18 year old limit
You really need to see this picture? That's a little worying
The law isn't hard to find, although it's very hard to see what it really means.
It was laid out quite rightly to stop minors being exploited. Where the law
starts and stops though is a lot more gray. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 252800 Posts: 17 | Date: 2008-07-28 18:42 It is legal to have sex at 16 in the UK, what is the big deal with topless pics
at 17. Not like we don't see page 3 boobs everyday from a very early age. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 196478 Posts: 11 | Date: 2008-07-29 05:15 I think important to be 18 or best - elder. But if she like her body and she
think her body likes other people so why not? Maybe she do it only for money. Or
mayby she has problems. Don't judge her |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-07-29 10:32 I really don't think its a good thing to go topless. It says many things about
the model.
I think i've come to see somethings about UK magazines. They've taken nudity as
their slogan or logo.
Though decency goes a long way. Its not jsut how one dresses, its about ones
image, thought and everything.
Libby |
|---|
|
|---|
| Date: 2008-10-28 08:57 she should never have posed |
|---|
Announcement |
|---|
| Hello Everyone!
JURGITA needs your help. We need moderators and contributors. get more information
Jurgita.com team |
|---|
Total results: 53 Pages: 1 | 2 | 3 [ 3] |
