Last post by Dominic Ventura in topic May The Luck O' Zeal Irish Be Yours Today & Always>

Topics: 4611
Posts: 49503

New Pics Of Lori

 
 
Total results: 12
Pages: 1    [1]
 
Just posted 3 pics of Lori. Please let me know what you think.
:thumbup: Cheers :thumbup:

Terence

I got them to moderate, she's a beauty:thumbup:
:saint:

Not the best light for a lady. I would only use this lighting style for dramatic effect
... :dunno:
Why do we struggle to paddle upstream while the river is taking us where we need to go?

Robert Leonard:

Not the best light for a lady. I would only use this lighting style for dramatic effect
... :dunno:


Yup That was the object of it. I will shoot her again in a few days and soften the light a bit more.
:thumbup: Cheers :thumbup:

Terence

Melissa Robertson:

I got them to moderate, she's a beauty:thumbup:



Thanks Mellisa I will let her know that. She thinks she is just run of the mill and is doing this to help me get more experience, but at 5'11" and 135 lbs and size 4-6 she could do this.
:thumbup: Cheers :thumbup:

Terence

I figured you were going for dramatic. You were using a window? Or was it a bank of lights? Huge catchlight in the eyes!

I would have preferred a slight bit more detail in the shadows--just enough to see faintly. The contrast was made possible by the proximity of the light, but being so close it made skin blemishes stand out as well.
If I haven't been there, I'm still planning on going!
If I haven't done it, I've still got time to try!

Charles Griffin:

I figured you were going for dramatic. You were using a window? Or was it a bank of lights? Huge catchlight in the eyes!

I would have preferred a slight bit more detail in the shadows--just enough to see faintly. The contrast was made possible by the proximity of the light, but being so close it made skin blemishes stand out as well.
:thumbup: Cheers :thumbup:

Terence

Terence Dunn:

[Charles Griffin: ...]


18 x 36 soft box at about 2 foot. I will shoot again in a few days with a low power setting on the fill with it to the lower left and move the key light further back. I also may change from the softbox to a 36" shoot through.
:thumbup: Cheers :thumbup:

Terence

What bothers me most is the burn-out. The light saturation is a bit much. The pink blouse ripples and washes to white in a distracting manner that unbalances the photo.

I do not quite know what is going on with the hard transistions from red to yellow-green on the facial shadow lines.

Did the site's compression degrade the quality of your image during upload? Or did you exceed the ability of your cameras chip to record color and tone gradations? Another possibility: If this is an edited image, then the saturation for those colors was set to high.

When you do you reshoot, try a couple of these suggestions:

Light the face and blouse separately. In capturing the shadow effect on the face, the color in the blouse was washed out. Different cloths absorb and reflect light differently. Sometimes it is the color of the clothing that gives you lighting problems. Therefore, to achieve the desired skin tone and preserve the color of the clothing, two separate lighting units should be considered. Adjust your light output appropriately and you can still get the light washed effect with the blouse's original coloring preserved.

I liked that you avoided a problem that many amateurs overlook. Your model looks close to the background but there is no "convict shadow". Bravo!

When shooting the face, the eyes tell the biggest story. A high-key/low-key contrast image of the face captures each eye in a different light. The emotion in each eye can appear different and contradict each other. It invites a tension that can lure you in to study it. I can see this in your third image of Lori. In the second image of Lori, her eye smiles through the shadow, emphasizing a mirth she is keeping inside.

So, watch how the shadow changes the message from the eye. Use it to tell the story of your picture.

The style of shot does not suit the model. I keep wondering what it was that you were looking for in the image. Why that style? Why her for that style? Were it meant to be a beauty shot the shadows would not have been arranged to keep a hard, straight chisel to her features.

Were it meant to be an art shot, I would watch the framing of the image and keep the composition such that the eye follows a natural curve downward from top left. Or where ever you want the viewers eye to go. Remember, even though it is a still image, it is being viewed by an audience that moves. Our eyes move around a picture in certain natural ways. Poor composition makes our eyes either ignore an image or stare at it in distaste. The movement of our eyes reflects certain emotions as viewers. Your image should move our eyes so that the message your photo wants to convey, gets through.

In the three pictures of Lori, no message is getting through to me except "Portrait Sitting". Would I be wrong to assume that the photo sitting was arranged as a training session for yourself?

Before she comes back for the follow up shoot, get yourself an apple, carrot, some raisins and toothpick. Yep. :) Make a smiley face on the apple.

Ah...if you have a cuddly doll or teddy bear around someplace, you can use the fruits to snack on. Otherwise, an apple with carrot for nose and raisins for eyes make a nice face to practice shadowing on.

You see, practicing with dummies gives you all the time in the world to play with lighting and angles without worrying about straining the patience f your model. For more advanced practice, go to a department store and talk to the manager about giving or selling you an old, unused mannequin. Make certain it is solid, not blow up, or your girlfriend will have some tough questions for you to answer.

The point is that you can work on lighting techniques at your leisure by setting up still life situations. When the model comes, now all you are doing is working on her emotional presentation because you have the lighting method down pat in your head. You should only have to make minor adjustments from there to accommodate skin tone and outfit work.

For my wildlife photography, I am practicing in my back yard all the time. I continually memorize what settings make what effects at what time of day. I practice on a leaf, blade of grass or any insect that wanders by. Automatically adjusting to changing natural light has become no problem for me because of repetitive practice. Now, when a creature I am assigned to photograph gets caught in my lens, my fingers automatically scroll to the right settings and I get the shot.

You want to be able to do this when you have your models present. Use that time to perfect how your camera sees the model. Use your down time to perfect lighting on still lifes.
:cantlook: Have faith that the universe will unfold as it should :cool:

WoW. :thumbup: Great info . Thanks Karl I will use the info. Especial the Teddy Dears. By son has some 4' tall ones. I will look into the Mannequin for sure. That was just a hole 5 minuts of shooting as she came by the house sor somthing else. As you say it was just for Training. As for the red / yellow / green, I think it is the sites compression. The sigma does very well with colours. Will have a go at them again tomorrow.
:thumbup: Cheers :thumbup:

Terence

I think the post is nice.

Leewan Leewan:

I think the post is nice.


Yeah. You can always count on professor Karl to step to the plate. Whenever I catch his name on the forums, I make a point of seeing what pearls of wisdom he is sharing.
Why do we struggle to paddle upstream while the river is taking us where we need to go?

Hello Everyone!

Jurgita.com team is willing to wish everyone the happiest holidays ever!
We hope the New Year will bring the joy, warmth and prosperity to you and your families. Thank you all for being with us during the past years and hope to see you all next year too. You are the best!

Jurgita.com team
 
 
Total results: 12
Pages: 1    [1]