Who Is Checking The Profile Names? Total results: 14 Pages: 1 [ 1] |
|---|
 ID: 245492 Posts: 68 | Date: 2009-10-19 03:35 I guess the moderation process still did not work. or people still hunting for
activity points.
Otherwise i could not explain why a member as "Luv2 Masturbate" got accepted.
And is there is no 2nd check from the mods or the admin in here? |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 296237 Posts: 19 | Date: 2009-10-19 06:10 here is so many mistake in moderation process, some profiles has height 5/6ft,
but weight shown about 2o/22 kg appx, if rejected..loose 5 activity points...&
many more.
The admn should be strict...this is my opinion.
I do agree with Raf.
waiting guidelines frome seniors. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 235463 Posts: 393 | Date: 2009-10-19 07:04 I rejected Luv2 the other day on a bad surname basis. You know what they say
about too many cooks. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 235463 Posts: 393 | Date: 2009-10-19 07:15 I think he's going by Luv2eatwmn Luv2eat now. I just rejected that one. It came
from New York, too. Weight was the same along with the other info. Admin may
want to ban the IEP. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 255444 Posts: 842 | Date: 2009-10-19 07:22 Errors in weight are a minor concern compared to bad profile names. If a member
cannot take themselves seriously enough to provide a valid name we should not
take them seriously either and those profiles should be rejected at once. If
they make it through the moderation process, simply contact admin with a link to
the profile and it will be deleted from their end.Why do we struggle to paddle upstream while the river is taking us where we need to go? |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 233525 Posts: 113 | Date: 2009-10-19 08:03 Seen a lot of strange names. Ones that catch my eye and have been approved, I
just contact admin. That usually takes care of it.
As for some names from places I have never even heard of, I scratch my head. " A word is worth a thousand pictures " |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 188071 Posts: 538 | Date: 2009-10-19 11:04 Good Day Gentlemen & Aimili
I have just come across this profile, & have sent a ticket to Admin' to delete
the Profile.
This profile has also visited my profile...I do not approve of a 16 year old (or
any aged member for that matter) using lewd names.
This is not what this site is about.'Hair' TODAY, (Cy)  .:. NET=---> Tomorrow!   |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 245492 Posts: 68 | Date: 2009-10-19 11:22 If you are not sure about a place, just use maps.google.com, it might help
you.
And about the names, it is just a pity that people don't care. |
|---|
Mystique Eyed Phoenix IonU |
|---|
 ID: 114505 Posts: 1096 | Date: 2009-10-19 11:53 Ralf Winkler:
If you are not sure about a place, just use maps.google.com, it might help
you.
And about the names, it is just a pity that people don't care.
Ralf
You are so right ... many newbies or miscellaneous members are in it for
activity point collecting, not for the concern or consideration of future
ramifications of the site's under age policy or no porn policy. I have requested
that Admin' grant &/or enforce new restriction for these violators to be
disabled from jeopardizing Jurgita's site from further protesters, etc.
Ticket Violation no#2 has just been sent by me............../' |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 188071 Posts: 538 | Date: 2009-10-19 12:16 The afore mentioned profile has been rejected by me three times ...........however, I
believe it's time for implementing some type of Appointed [m] Moderators' buddy
system to evoke violators on a more efficient basis, with Admin' monitoring our
ability to gain rapid results in the most derogatory of site violation offensive
instances, without hesitation../''Hair' TODAY, (Cy)  .:. NET=---> Tomorrow!   |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 245492 Posts: 68 | Date: 2009-10-19 12:43 Well, just for the records, before i made this thread, i sent a ticket to the
admin and complain about the profile.
He also visited my profile, and you can guess why. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 245492 Posts: 68 | Date: 2009-10-19 12:44 Oh, and i forgot to mention this.
I made it public in the forum to open some people eyes.
But i am in doubt if they are able to read, otherwise this profile never would
be approved. |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 255444 Posts: 842 | Date: 2009-10-19 12:53 Andromeda V1:
The afore mentioned profile has been rejected by me three times  ...........however, I
believe it's time for implementing some type of Appointed [m] Moderators' buddy
system to evoke violators on a more efficient basis, with Admin' monitoring our
ability to gain rapid results in the most derogatory of site violation offensive
instances, without hesitation../'
I did send a recommendation some time ago that perhaps a system should be set up
that at any given time, three moderators could block a profile for a period of
24 or 48 hours until admin could review it. I did not hear back...Why do we struggle to paddle upstream while the river is taking us where we need to go? |
|---|
|
|---|
 ID: 194304 Posts: 143 | Date: 2009-10-19 13:02 Photography by Mark:
I think he's going by Luv2eatwmn Luv2eat now. I just rejected that one. It came
from New York, too. Weight was the same along with the other info. Admin may
want to ban the IEP.
Yeah, Mark
I know Mystique/Andromeda contacted me to reject these two ID's (whose names
aren't worth mentioning, again): so it is with members #299318 & #141124. So
here's hoping something takes effect soon. I have a gut instinct that this is
not the kind of attention they were after, by us banding together to get
operations in Co-sync with Jurgita's guidelines.
Thanks to all for joining together to help push for results.
Regards,
Dominic
once upon a time.
|
|---|
Total results: 14 Pages: 1 [ 1] |